Why present it as a motion? Because every Board member will (or rather should) be there, and we can hash it out right there. If people have a problem with it, they can let me know and I'll consider a friendly amendment. Anything reasonable will be accepted. Specific demands about specific blocks or zoning categories will not - this document is best left open. Committee meetings tend to have severely lower attendance, and an issue this important should be considered with as many folks as possible. Thus, the motion.
That's my story. I'm sticking to it. MTOPP is once again planning on being a disruptive force. Alicia's asked her supporters to speak at the meeting, but the rule is that you can only speak to an agenda item in the public session. The agenda items aren't on zoning. The motion I'll present will happen in the business session, which the public may attend, but speaking on the floor is limited to CB9 members.
Here 'tis:
Community
Board 9
890
Nostrand Avenue
Brooklyn,
NY 11225
Resolution
from Community Board 9
Calling
Upon the NYC Dept of City Planning
To
Immediately Begin A Study of Community District 9, Brooklyn
Focusing
on the Specific Issues Raised at the Listening Forum Held On March 17th 2014
Whereas Community District 9
is comprised of the distinct neighborhoods of South Crown Heights, northern
parts of Flatbush, Prospect Lefferts Gardens, and Wingate, and is bordered by
the historic landmarks of Prospect Park and Eastern Parkway; and
Whereas Community District 9
boasts such prestigious cultural institutions as the Brooklyn Museum, the
Brooklyn Botanic Garden, and the Brooklyn Public Library; and such notable
medical institutions as Kings County Hospital Center, a number one Trauma
Center; SUNY Health Science Center, Kingsboro Psychiatric Center, and
Kingsbrook Jewish Medical Center; and the educational
institution Medgar Evers College of the State University of NY; and
Whereas Community District 9
is a unique blend of people of extraordinarily diverse heritage; American,
AFRICAN, Caribbean, European, Asian and Hispanic descent; and families have
thrived in Community District 9 for generations living along our tree lined
streets and enjoying the beauty and nuances of the neighborhoods; and
Whereas the existing zoning
designations and prevailing land uses does not provide nor address all of the
needs of the community; and
Whereas Community Board 9
held a forum at the Brooklyn Botanic Garden on Monday, March 17th 2014 and in subsequent meetings in the community where
residents of the community expressed various concerns; a summary of which is as
follows:
1) Preserve the existing character of the neighborhood
- Prevent/limit out of context
(i.e. high-rise) development in the R7-1 zoned ALL
areas of the district
- Make provision for
incremental expansion of homes in R2 and R4 districts
2) Adjust current zoning designations to conform to prevailing uses and
densities
- Residential zoning designations
mapped in Community District 9 often do not match the type of housing that
exists
3) Create opportunities for affordable housing development
- Make every provision to protect
residents from displacement (e.g. anti-harassment areas/measures)
4) Consider the appropriate blocks and lots on
which modest increased residential density can be accommodated, provided that
adequate restrictions on height are observed - six stories or 70 feet should be
the maximum throughout the district - and all efforts are made to maximize
affordable housing options while staying within these height limits.
5) Ensure that new development does not overwhelm existing
infrastructure
- Address parking
shortages in congested areas
- Address the need
for improved sewer and water capacity
- Address the need for adequate schools
- Address the need for adequate schools
-
Address the need for adequate transportation, both public transit and vehicular
traffic
Be it Therefore Resolved
that NYC community Board 9, Brooklyn, calls upon the NYC Department of City Planning
to immediately begin a study of this district to address the issues raised in
the foregoing summary; and
Be It Further Resolved that
Community Board 9 calls on the Department of City Planning to implement a text
change for the institution of special height and setback regulations in R701
areas in Community District 9, pursuant to the Quality Housing Program; and
Be It Further Resolved that
Community Board 9 stands ready to work with the Department of City Planning to
spearhead public hearings to gather additional input from the community as we
seek to address the critical concerns express by the constituency.
Adopted this 9th day of December, 2014
Community Board 9, Brooklyn
3 comments:
I guess that's best we can hope for but really all new development should have no parking. That's the best way forward in transit first paradigm. Parking requirements only make buildings more expensive, a lot more expensive and don't address the needs of the vast majority of the neighborhood. (That's why all these new buildings are filled with ZipCar places, the residents don't have enough cars to justify the minimum requirements.) More cars only begets more cars. Far better to have to be using development to fund transit improvements rather than supporting single use occupancy vehicles. But I guess that's a whole other fight.
So is changing a couple words gonna settle down that pack of screeching weirdos or are they still gonna go all "Oswald was a patsy" on you?
Thanks for making the revision and offering to bring it to a vote in the business part of the meeting. I hope it works! Hard to understand the CB's lack of movement on addressing this.
Post a Comment