An interesting and perhaps a bit heated exchange broke out in the last few posts on the planned residential tower at 626 Flatbush, and I thought I'd elevate a germane exchange to a post, since I think a commenter got a bit of a misread, and their feelings were ones I've heard echoed a lot recently, though not so much on this blog. The exchange went thusly (I'm leaving out the less relevant comments):
Lifetime on Lefferts said...
The fact is that many people have
been not so secretly wanting this to happen for years. This is the payoff for
their investment. They don't care if there's some collateral damage. They can
rationalize all they want but this building is a victory for everyone who
wishes they could have afforded to live somewhere else. But it's a loss for
everyone who needed this neighborhood to stay the affordable side of the park.
You can claim your victory but you don't have to be smug about it.
December 9, 2013 at 11:46 PM
diak
said...
I'd like to respectfully ask
"Lifetime on Lefferts" what evidence you have for your comments
(11:46PM above). Not grudges or resentments. Not assumptions or stereotypes
about people who you probably don't actually know.
Evidence.
December 10, 2013 at 4:10 PM
Lifetime said...
Many people I know first hand have
told me they attempted to buy in other neighborhoods and were priced out. You
must be blind or deaf not to know that. They settled on PLG. It was not there
first choice. And now they are thrilled to see that there neighborhood is
becoming more like the ones they couldn't afford. You ask for evidence. Why not
ask around.
December 10, 2013 at 4:47 PM
Clarkson FlatBed said...(after claims he/she was referring to ALL newcomers and buyers)
Sticking up for Lifetime here I'd
say that he/she may have put it inelegantly but I don't think they were
claiming to be talking about everyone. Actually I know that - s/he said
"many." This is what I'm talking about that everyone is so defensive
on these issues. SOME people obviously feel they want the neighborhood to be
more like others. SOME people fear that were it to become so, they'd be priced
out. SOME people have lived here a long time and have always loved it. SOME
people are probably brand new and couldn't be happier. That's not a dichotomy,
that's a quadchotomy, and there are many more "sides" I'm sure.
But the defensiveness is troubling to me, my own included if I'm honest,
because I think what's at play is a very imperfect study of what's been, what
is and what is to come. The change happens so fast and it's scary. I'm frankly
floored by what's happened in Brooklyn in the last dozen years since 9/11.
Whole neighborhoods are completely unrecognizable. After 9/11 we thought the
City might just disappear as we knew it. It did. Just not like we thought it
might!
And c'mon guys, let's be honest here. The racial change of neighborhoods is
absolutely astounding. There is no precedent for it, accept perhaps the Great
Migration northward. If the PPEN movement skews black, it is likely the result
of this. I think Lifetime was pointing out that the forces of demographic
change are extraordinarily powerful, both race and class (I'm putting words in
mouth here) and that some seem to be winning and others losing. How can you
argue the point? I can't see it otherwise, frankly. We don't have to take it so
personally, really. If he/she had said the word ALL you'd have a beef, but
that's not what they said. Diak in particular said that Lifetime was condemning
all, and I think that's unfair. I suspect your nuanced view of the neighborhood
is beyond that person's criticism, so loosen up.
And to those who do wish this neighborhood get a little more Prospect Heights,
your wish will soon be at hand. I'm a betting man. I give it five years tops,
barring a major terrorist attack or financial implosion.
December 10, 2013 at 10:48 PM
Anonymous
said...
I bought here this summer not
because we could not afford to live on the other side of the park, but because
we could buy an entire house that was the nicest we had seen in over 9 months
of looking and for the same price as the single floors or duplexes of
brownstones in PS or the classic 6s and 7s on PPW we were originally going to
buy.
I bought here specifically because I expect it to change significantly over the
next 5-10 years and sure hope it does both for our investment and for our daily
quality of life. I'd rather it look a lot more like prospect heights on
Flatbush avenue than the hot mess it is right now.
I've lived in quite a few of the Brooklyn neighborhoods that went through
similar changes throughout the years and it certainly seems as though it's
about to happen here as well and the sooner the better. Not so I can cash out,
but so I can raise my family here and not worry about people getting shot in
broad daylight on Flatbush avenue like we saw the first week we moved in this summer.
Hopefully the development gets done with some sort of compromise to make it
more contextual and still has the impact of bringing more amenities and a
cleaner , safer Flatbush avenue.
December 10, 2013 at 11:55 PM
Okay Anon 11:55. I appreciate your honesty, though as always I'd appreciate a screen name so we know who you are throughout the conversation. However, I must point out that you are EXACTLY who Lifetime On Lefferts was talking about. You would have bought that big house had you been able to afford it in other more gentrified neigborhoods. And now you hope that development like the new building will move the nabe towards a more like Prospect Heights-like scene. (I don't think I need to note that PH has become much wealthier and whiter in the last 10 years, so we can infer that's what you want for Lefferts.)
You call Flatbush Ave a hot mess. You point to shootings and I suspect lack of stores catering to your interests and perhaps trash and/or graffiti. Perhaps you've noticed tough guys on corners hanging out, and wondered which of them are dealing drugs or members of violent gangs (most of them are not by the way). And so now you want Big D developers to come in and solve your problems.
The Q would argue, as he has repeatedly, that these problems can be solved by current residents working together, and does not have to involve wholesale demographic turnover, which ultimately is what you're suggesting, because I guarantee you the newcomers at 626 will not resemble the guys on Flatbush that you want gone. The babies will most definitely be tossed with the bathwater.
You can clean up trash and invite economic development with a strong merchants association come B.I.D. (this is happening). You can organize and work with various law enforcement and create watchgroups and clean up drugs and gangs (believe it or not, this is happening). You can encourage local business owners to carry more of the items you're going cross town to buy.
There is a lot of great stuff on Flatbush Avenue, much of it deserving of support, and some of it already thriving. Your "hot mess" depiction is indicative of the attitude I find most problematic. You'd rather replace than improve.
That's why there's resistance.