A few months back the
Q visited a local charter school, Explore, and interviewed the CEO of its fledgling network of schools - Morty Ballen. The school's well-run, has swell teachers (hi Marie!), engaged students. Yes, it's a nice, small, decent grammar school, just down the road (Parkside/Nostrand). Few parents I've met even have it on their radar. The NY Times decided to
write about it, not because it's a nice school in a mediocre district (ours, District 17), but because its writer Sonny Kleinfield wanted to make a point about de facto segregation in City schools. I promised myself that as I, a decidedly white parent, started the search for a school for my oldest daughter, also pretty darn white, while living in a predominantly black district (that number 17 again), would share my thoughts throughout in a painful public display of parental angst, because in my heart I feel there's a lack of honesty or dialogue on the whole notion of "choosing" a school. Actually, to be honest, I have no doubts that Lil' Miss Q will matriculate at an awesome school, wherever that may be, and if not, I'll pull her out and put her somewhere else. I don't share some other parents' fears that they won't find a good school and that their children will be forever damned to bus tables at a Chuck E Cheese for the rest of their lives as a result. It's kindergarten. They're probably gonna have a ball anywhere they go. This process is about parents, pure and simple. I know some will disagree, but really, there's a fairly prevalent herd mentality to the proceedings, like the way everyone was suddenly into exotic salts (all of which my Neanderthal tongue would call...salty). Another reason I'm not fretting is that to date I haven't met even one parent (and remember I'm on the old side so a lot of my friends have already been through this) who didn't find a school they like...even love. Public school. That's right, public school. I'm not planning on applying to private school, not out of some great patriotic love of country or because I hate rich people, but public school was good to me (albeit in Iowa), and public schools in NYC can be great, no matter what conventional wisdom says, and full of the diversity and energy that is NYC, and most or least importantly depending on which day of the month you ask, on pay day
or say the day after, I can't afford it. (Most crucially though, I really want people to stop calling private schools "independent schools." Right now. It's annoying. They're private. Like Harvard's private, UMASS is public. McCarren Park Pool is public; the Y is private. The Harvard Club is private. Popeye's is public. Private, public. Public, private. No independent. And yes I know it's the opposite in England. I don't think they use the word independent there either, though.)
So far I've met with the principal at PS92 on Parkside near Rogers. I've talked intensively to parents at the Lefferts Gardens Charter School (I'll save that post for another day after I talk with the new leader there). I went to the year-end extravaganza at PS249, known as the Caton School near the Parade Ground. I took a tour at PS9 in Prospect Heights. I took a tour at PS295 in south, south Park Slope near the cemetery. On Thursday I went with another dad to PS770, the New American Academy, a district school that's making waves with its unique super-size classroom approach via a Harvard (there's that word again) PhDer, the charismatic and kosher headmaster Shimon Waronker. I've got tours coming up to PS's 139, 39, 133, 10, 11, 375, 705 and charter schools from here to Yonkers. My girl's not even four. And do you think I've become exasperated at the very sight of a metal book locker? (do they have those air holes in them in case a kid gets locked in one?) Not at all. I'm having a ball. Schools are fun; grade-schoolers are adorable; it's awesome to watch teachers in action; it's a gas to look at all the artwork hanging everywhere; it's fascinating to see how principals and parents "sell" their schools; it's wild to see how much schools actually have in common, even when they have vastly different reputations. And it's heartbreaking to watch a few parents clearly suffering from crippling anxiety. It's as if every terrible school experience is being relived by the middle-aged parent of a kindergartener-to-be, with even the site of a manic lunch room enough to send shivers up the spine of a once-taunted over-achiever. Sometimes it feels like a competition, this school scouting, but of course most decisions are made by zone, by lottery, by district, or by an indecipherable last-minute shifting of seats, in which principals fill their schools in August or even September to make sure they maximize the amount of dollars, figured per pupil, coming into the coffers. And yes, they divvy out seats to parents who really, really want it, and maybe to friends and friends of friends. Wouldn't you? And yes, you can lie about where you live, and plenty of people do that, but frankly I prefer the non-liars who are just really persistent and have the stomach to wait til they hear they're in, maybe on the third day of school. Yes, it's stressful, but so is taking the L train. NYC is not for wusses.
And why is it like this, exactly? All this
Strang und Durm. I thought "choice" was supposed to be a good thing. But like the ridiculous number of choices in chewing gums, we now spend all our time stressing and envying and lying about our addresses rather than simply going to our zoned school and making it the best it can be. (Actually that's a ridiculous metaphor, because I usually just choose some variant on spearmint). And then once we connive our way into a "better" school, I guess we have to trumpet its virtues so we can make ourselves feel good about our diligence and parental decision-making. It's all perfectly understandable, and incredibly sad. Again, we could just go to our local school and try to make it the best it can be. Parents really are that crucial, so says everyone I've spoken to.
I keep hearing the same refrain in my head, something someone said a while back and I can't even remember who. "Education is being delivered." Yes, quite right. Everywhere I've been, and I suspect everywhere I'll go, education is indeed being delivered. Much more important than any reputation or method or testing regimen or homework scheme is going to be the teacher my kid has for kindergarten (and the amount of fun my baby says she had each day when she comes home from school and how much she loves her friends.) And it's with this notion of how crucial it is that little Q has good, loving, supportive teachers that, I gotta say, New American Academy, PS770, seems the best of the lot so far. And here's why.
Waronker's much ballyhooed method of 60 kids per classroom is really about a simple ratio - 15:1. The kids don't have one kindergarten teacher - they have four. One is a master teacher paid in excess of $100K. The other three are vetted as rigorously as the master. I met one of these jedi-teachers - Mr. G - and he was awesome. He says the teachers really dig it, this new system. Waronker's school is within the DoE, meaning it's union, unlike most charters, and generally speaking the union is more beneficial to a teacher's security and retirement. We can argue the relative merits of union vs. non-union, but suffice to say we'd probably
all like the basic rights and benefits offered by a good contract. But at NAA, thanks to a special exemption from DoE, they don't have a lot of bureaucracy over their heads to boot, or boots over their heads, and only Waronker is their direct boss, and he seems pretty fair and supportive. The four classroom teachers meet daily for an hour and half, discussing lessons, learning new stuff, talking about YOUR kid. During that time, your kid is exercising and eating breakfast, presumably not simultaneously. Parents can come anytime, and are encouraged to have "breakfast" with staff on Fridays. Your kid doesn't have to ask to go to the bathroom, she can just go when she needs to, and that fits with Waronker's war on the Prussian authoritarian system of schools which he loves to debate. Is the food good? Waronker guesses so, but he keeps kosher and has never tried it personally. Hey, you can bring a lunch if you're worried. The classrooms seem giant, and probably seem even gianter when you're three feet tall, but the spaces are easily arranged into separate spaces for different teachers to do their specific strong suit teaching. Art is part of everything. Inquiry is part of everything. Everything is part of everything. Oh, and NO homework. Ever. Even til grade 8 if they end up expanding that far. (The backlash against homework and testing is in full swing, though a number of parents I've met don't mind using those test scores to judge schools. Funny thing, that.)
So what's the catch? Simple! It's east of here. Way east. It's in our district, but it's on the other side, in "Rugby," which is what they call it on the map, but it's about as close as you can get to the beginning of Brownsville without being in Brownsville. They emphasized that a free bus picks you up, anywhere in the district farther than a half-mile. A dad and I walked there from Tugboat in about 25 minutes...nice walk on a good day. There really IS a swell kosher grocery store over there by the by, that some parents have raved about on the listserve. BUT it's near Brownsville. And Brownsville, in all of our imaginations, means murder and violence. People say the same things about Brownsville that they used to say about Crown Heights. Or parts of Flatbush. Or Ocean Avenue near the park. Or, god forgive me, Franklin Avenue. As a parent pointed out to me, however, it's not like 4th Avenue in Park Slope is any great shakes. No offense, but it's really bleak over there, ESPECIALLY with all the new luxury buildings. And yet, it's west, it's affluent, very few murders, and the parent bodies at most schools over in District 15 have more college-saturated folks than any in the deep 'hood. Notice I said parent bodies, cuz I'm still convinced the kids themselves probably don't care whether their peers are rich/poor, white/black, working-class/upper-class. We're the ones who care about that stuff, and you can almost feel the tension in the air when we talk, we parents: yes we have strong ideals about equality and furthering Dr. King's ideals (happy MLK day!), but when push comes to shove "it's MY kid we're talking about, you know, not some fictional ideal child." There's an eerie resonance of decades past hanging over the proceedings, and it's an uncomfortable fit with the progressive mindset of most folks I know. After all, we CHOSE to live here. Most of us could've lived in any American city and afforded 90% of the neighborhoods. And of course, as we all know, not everyone gets to choose. It's all very twisted and vexing but it can even be a bit exhilarating when care and compassion are the watchwords. Fear often rules the day, though. And I'm not exempt of course. I want what's best for my kid, really I do. I just don't trust my instincts, and I'm afraid of the herd. Or making decisions based on the westerly gust of wind.
So despite the fact that there's already an exciting alternative in the district, parents are clamoring for more options. Close to home options. Or maybe, close to culture options. Even though 770/NMA is really quite accessible. Even though those options have yet to be tried. Even though those options are purely theoretical, or anecdotal, at this point. Before you pass on 770 though, I encourage you to take a look (if you're a parent of course. It'd be kinda creepy if you aren't, at least if you're a dude, and not say a student or journalist or something). There's a bunch of open houses coming up.
Given all the blah-blah-blah I noted, it came as no surprise that when word got out that a new school might get a charter, and they might locate in our district, parents have showed up at meetings and signed petitions to get said proposed school to come to PLG or environs. (Though I'd be quick to point out that even if it ends up in District 17, it could end up co-locating as far east as PS770. Just saying.) The school certainly has a lot of promise, headed by three experienced and ambitious teachers who've embarked on a trip across America to visit "best practices" from here to Tacoma. It's called the Odyssey Project, and on the surface it sounds great, though in my opinion a bit gimmicky. (Check out the video and Kickstarter
here, that raised more thank $80K.) One of the three, Todd Sutler (read his
posts here), has worked at popular charter Community Roots in Ft. Greene. A number of friends have kids at that school, and it gets raves, though some have told me privately it's a good school, not earth-shattering, as in it still comes down to who is your teacher. Of course I'd trust a good teacher to know a good teacher when he/she interviews one, so it makes sense that someone like Todd would make a good head of operations. And yet, his project isn't even approved yet, and there's no knowing where it will be placed. So why all the excitement?
I've definitely noticed that "new" seems to equal "better" in many people's mind, and a school that hasn't even gotten its charter certainly qualifies as new, or even pre-new, thus, perhaps, the excitement level. Oddly, there's ANOTHER charter school opening in the district, just
this fall, on Empire Boulevard (again east, of course, since the district is mostly east of us). It's called "Citizens of the World," which is not a great name, but neither is "The Beatles" when you think about it, but the band was pretty good. Citizens of the World has garnered some negative attention due to the proximity of its founding board chair to
Eva Moskowitz (he's her husband, Eric Grannis), and Eva's a "controversial" figure in the new school movement probably not so much because of what she does (her schools are pretty much education deliverers, don't you know) but because she's outspoken against unions and convinced that charters should benefit ALL kids, not just underserved poor minority ones. Those are fighting words to some, and in fact an organization (or is it just a few disgruntled individuals?) has grown up to fight her planned CoW school in Williamsburg. (angry response to CoW
here.) The group is called Williamsburg and Greenpoint Parents for Our Public Schools, or WAGPOPS, I'm not kidding they call it that.) Frankly, if you're into public school charters then you probably line up with most of Moskowitz's thinking, from what I can tell she's hardly radical within the movement, maybe just louder, so if you're someone who's considering going to a charter I wouldn't worry about her too much, unless of course you go to one of her schools - the Success Academies. She just seems to get a lot of press, and has a habit of putting schools in places like, um, Williamsburg, where a fight is inevitably going to erupt about who her schools are actually
for. I mean those buyers of million dollar condos gotta send their kids somewhere, right? You can see where that dialogue goes really fast...right into the class and race discussion that dogs so much of this stuff.
The flyer for the new CoW school (they don't call it CoW, but they should) says about what every new school seems to be saying. Strong leadership. Diversity. High Achievement. Experiential. Hands-on. Parental Involvement. Great teachers. Accountability. Are these words important to you? Then just about every other school in a 10-mile radius will be for you. It will be interesting to see how the school does though. I'm cynical I guess, but not so cynical I wouldn't love to see the school succeed and turn its kids into model Citizens of the World. I look forward to finding out more, and I began a dialogue with a rep from the school, and will be happy to write more about what I find out.
I'd have thought all the double-speak and triple-speak would make me depressed. But actually, I'm finding that most schools look pretty damn good compared to the demoralizing litany of negativity aimed at them by politicians and media pundits. These are real people teaching our kids, and it would appear that most of them are committed to their craft and interested in their kids' well-being. Of course there are rotten teachers, probably in both "good" schools and well as "bad." I recently heard a tale recounted of a miserably drug-adled and incompetent teacher in a highly prestigious Manhattan prep school, tenured to boot. I also recently heard tale of a long-past-her-prime public school teacher barely staying awake through classes and counting days til retirement. But come to think of it, I had those teachers in Ames, Iowa too. Don't you remember a few from
your youth? And then there's the simple fact that by the time you're old enough to really know what's going on, the prevailing attitude, as Louis C.K. likes to remind us..."school sucks, right?" Have you never uttered those words? Some years...it really DID suck. Some teachers were awesome. Some were total duds who should have been put out to pasture years ago. Seems some things never change. And there will always be a certain degree of suckage.
For me, the most absurd argument I've heard yet was one that seemed so obvious it HAD to be true. This is from an actual smart person, who I really respect, who I dare say probably doesn't believe in black magic. But I swear to god I almost bought it. "When you walk into a school, you'll just know." Know what? That the color scheme is off? That the bathrooms don't have doors on them? That the clock is five minutes fast? That the security guard would rather be anywhere than right here right now? I don't know about you, but I've been notably wrong on my first impressions at least half the time throughout my life. Okay, I was right about my wife, but I was dead wrong about R.E.M.'s "Murmur" and cabbage. I even thought that "Mad Men" was a boring gimmick show, going nowhere interesting after the first episode. Actually, I still think that, but I'm pretty sure everyone with a television disagrees with me.
Suum Cuique, as the Latins used to say, though probably not in reference to a cable TV show. Maybe in reference to Greek tragedies or pastas?
I've written way too much for tonight, and the president is swearing so I should go now. Or rather he's swearing in, or the chief justice is swearing, and maybe this time they won't fumble the text and they'll swear legally. I think if I were to sum up my feelings thus far, it would be: there are a lot of fine schools, there are a lot of fine teachers. In the end, we parents are all trying to quantify something quite unquantifiable. Even all the test scores and teacher evaluations miss the keyest point of all. How about the teachers? How do THEY feel about their school? Seriously, has anyone ever asked that question and created a metric on it? Because I would probably trust that number more than any other currently floating in the ether. I want my kid to be in a nurturing, safe, healthy environment where the teachers feel happy and free to do what they love to do. If a principal promises that in his or her spiel, I might actually be attracted to that school. That's why Shimon impressed me - he made teacher satisfaction a big priority, and my ears pricked up and a smile started to form on my lips. Now THAT's revolutionary. (In fairness, Morty Ballen said that too, and I hope I hear more of it.) It just seems wrong, wrong, wrong to me to keep bashing teachers and threatening them and grading them like meat. Don't get me wrong, the rotten meat should be fed to the dogs (or rather asked to retire...sorry, didn't mean to sound so cruel). But most teachers are good, getting better, and need encouragement and mentorship and support and professional development and a hug now and then. And $100K with benefits.
I'm left with the simplest, most confusing gut feeling of all - confronting my own fear of heading east. It's complicated though, because the band HEAD EAST made one of my favorite records of my 8th grade - "Never Been Any Reason" from its AOR triumph FLAT AS A PANCAKE. That was one of the years that "school sucked," and no teacher, method, charter, philosophy or progressive model would have preventing it from sucking. It just sucked. And looking at those guys in the band, I'll bet they had a pretty sucky year or two too. They probably brought it on themselves, but still...
Look, it's not going to win culinary medals, but it's a pretty decent new option. I've given them a hard time on the Q for "appropriating" the NY Giants logo. I mean, people pay good money for proprietary fonts. (Ask Toby Frere-Jones, whom I met when he was still in high school, and I peeked in to his bedroom one day to see him meticulously copying typefaces and thought to myself, that poor geeky child, he doesn't stand a chance.) Past posts here have come down hard on their old sign, then their abrupt change of scale, still leaving the blatant "come and sue me" graphics. Below is what it USED to was:
